|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE IBERO AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EDITION BOOK OF COMMUNICATIONS III INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS, ON MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PUERTO REAL, CÁDIZ, 7, 8, 9, Y 10 |
OCEANS
DVD
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OTHER FOMAR LINKS |
PRICES : The oceans sustain the biosphere from which humankind and all living creatures on earth rose. To the first men in history the sea meant the challenge of the unknown. With them begins the great seafaring adventure, from floating to exploration, leading as far as today's global communication among nations and the scientific knowledge of the deep oceans.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MAGAZINE SEMESTRAL ABOUT INFORMATION OF THE SEA AMBERGRIS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WORLD CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE UNESCO
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Mary Rose was an English Tudor carrack warship and one of the first to be able to fire a full broadside of cannons. The Mary Rose was well equipped with 78 guns (91 after an upgrade in 1536). Built in Portsmouth , England ( 1509 – 1510 ) she was thought to be named after King Henry VIII 's sister Mary and the rose , the Tudor emblem. She was one of the earliest purpose-built warships to serve in the English Navy ; it is thought that she never served as a merchant ship . She displaced 500 tons (700 tons after 1536), was 38.5 m long and 11.7 m abeam and her crew consisted of 200 sailors, 185 soldiers, and 30 gunners. Although she was the pride of the English fleet, she was sunk in the Solent , and it is thought she sank during an engagement with the French fleet on July 19 , 1545 . The exact cause of her sinking has not been definitely determined but is thought to be because of instability. The surviving section of the ship was raised in 1982 and is now on display in Portsmouth Historic Dockyard along with an extensive collection of well preserved artifacts. Contents[ hide ]
CareerShe served as the flagship of Admiral Sir Edward Howard in the Italian Wars and was frequently engaged. On 10 August 1512 she was the flagship of an English fleet of 50 ships that attacked the French at Brest in Brittany . The Mary Rose attacked the French Marie la Cordelière , the flagship of Admiral Ren de Clermont; in the battle the Marie la Cordelière was crippled and the Mary Rose was damaged and ran aground. The Marie la Cordelière then came under fire from the Mary James , the Sovereign , and the Regent , eventually blowing up with the loss of more than a thousand men. Thirty-two French ships were taken or destroyed in the battle. After the death of Edward Howard in 1513, the Mary Rose became the flagship of Lord High Admiral Sir Thomas Howard . In 1528 and again in 1536 the Mary Rose was rebuilt, having her displacement increased from 500 to 700 tons and now mounting 91 guns. The refits are thought to have added an extra deck, making her top-heavy and liable to roll in heavy seas. In 1545 , King Francis I of France launched an invasion of England with 30,000 soldiers in more than 200 ships. Against this invasion fleet—larger than the Spanish Armada forty-three years later—the English had about 80 ships and 12,000 soldiers, with the Mary Rose the flagship of Vice Admiral Sir George Carew. In early July the French entered the Solent channel, between Hampshire and the Isle of Wight . On July 19 , 1545 (see Battle of the Solent ) the English came out of Portsmouth and engaged the French at long range, little damage being done on either side. The next day was calm, and the French employed their galleys against the immobile English vessels. Toward evening a breeze sprang up and as Mary Rose advanced to battle she capsized and sank with the loss of all but 35 of her crew. There were sources that said that the ship had fired from the portside and made a sharp turn so it could fire from the starboard side. The turn was so sharp that the ship keeled over to one side but at the same time the gun ports were open so that water rushed in and the ship sank. Sources also suggest that the Mary Rose had the gunports too low for it to be stable. Furthermore, the ship was carrying a large number of soldiers on her upper decks, with the possible result of further raising her centre of gravity and making her even more unstable. As was common in warships of the time, the upper decks were covered with netting to prevent soldiers from enemy ships from boarding. When the Mary Rose sank, this netting prevented many from escaping in time and contributed to the high percentage of casualties. Furthermore many sailors could not swim, as having a reputation for superstition , they regarded this as tempting fate. Losses were therefore particularly severe. ExperimentsResearchers for a television programme used an exact scale model of the Mary Rose to investigate the causes suggested for her sinking. Metal weights were used to simulate the presence of troops on the upper decks. Initial tests showed that the Mary Rose was able to make the turn described by eyewitnesses without capsizing. In later tests, a fan was used to create a breeze similar to the one reported to have suddenly sprung up on the day of the sinking as the real Mary Rose went to make the turn. As the model went to make the turn, the breeze in the upper works of the ship forced the ship to turn at a more acute angle than before, forcing her lower gun ports below the waterline . Water entered the ship, increasing the degree of the list, and causing the rate of flooding to increase. The ship quickly keeled over and capsized, sinking completely within a few seconds.The sequence of events closely followed what eyewitnesses had reported had occurred, particularly the suddenness with which the ship sank. The researchers concluded that numerous causes had contributed to making the Mary Rose unstable and top heavy, such as:
In addition to these weaknesses, the gun ports were cut too low in the ship's side, perhaps in an attempt to fit more cannon and create a more powerful warship.These ports should have been closed as the ship went to make the turn, but for some reason, possibly a breakdown in communication, or an oversight by the sailors, they were not. Despite all these factors combining to create a hazardous situation, the experiment showed that the Mary Rose's sinking was not inevitable. The sudden gust of wind that caught the ship at the crucial point of her turn was the final fatal contribution to the sinking. ConsequencesThe loss of one of the most powerful Tudor warships afloat caused considerable consternation, particularly as it sank within sight of King Henry VIII who was watching from Southsea Castle nearby. The fact that it sank was particularly unusual for the time. The most common cause of the loss of a warship was through fire. The lack of powerful cannon and the robustness of wooden ships made it difficult for ships to be damaged sufficiently in engagements for them to sink. There was also no immediate explanation for the sinking, such as a violent storm, or foundering on rocks.The loss of the Mary Rose therefore entered the public consciousness and was remembered, whereas most ship losses over the period were not. Modern work on the wreckRediscoveryOn June 16 , 1836 the Mary Rose was found when a fishing net caught on the wreck, and diver John Deane recovered timbers, guns , longbows , and other items. But the location was forgotten after Deane stopped work on the site in 1840. Alexander McKee started a new search in 1965 , and in 1967 Professor Harold Edgerton found an acoustic anomaly by using side-scan sonar . In 1971 a springtide, combined with a severe gale, uncovered a layer of sediment , leaving several structural timbers clearly visible. In the years that followed, it became clear that the wreck lay on her starboard side, at an angle of 60°. On 5 February 1974 the Mary Rose wreck became the second wrecksite (along with others) to be protected under the Protection of Wrecks Act . The wrecksite remains protected today even after the lifting of the majority of the remaining ship timber. In 1979 the Mary Rose Trust was formed and an archeological team under the direction of Dr. Margaret Rule , CBE, began work to excavate the wreck. First, the wreck was lifted by means of a lifting frame. After that, the wreck, still under water, could be lifted onto a support cradle. On October 11 , 1982 the wreck was lifted from the water and put upright in a dry dock with a temperature of 2–6 °C and a relative humidity of 95%. PreservationIn 1994 work started on a three-stage conservation process using low-molecular-weight polyethylene glycol (a wax , essentially). The second stage consists of spraying the wreck with a high-molecular-weight polyethylene glycol; these first two stages will take at least twenty years to complete. In the third stage, the wreck will be slowly dried. This preservation technique is the same as that begun in 1961 for the Vasa , a Swedish ship of the line which capsized in 1628 and is now on display in Stockholm . The Vasa is virtually intact while the Mary Rose is an almost perfect longitudinal vertical cross-section, due to marine worms such as the shipworm Teredo navalis destroying the port side above the seabed. The expertise and facilities developed for the preservation of the Mary Rose has benefited many other archaeological projects. Experts from the Mary Rose Trust helped conserve the Dover Bronze Age Boat and the timbers from Seahenge . Along with remains of around half the crew, a great number of artifacts were uncovered during excavation, including navigational and medical equipment, carpentry tools, guns, longbows , arrows with traces of copper -rich binding glue still remaining on the tips, cooking and eating utensils, lanterns , backgammon boards, playing dice, logs for the galley 's ovens, and even a well-preserved shawm , a long lost predecessor of the oboe , from which a fully functioning model has since been replicated. DisplayThese artifacts, and the wreck itself, are displayed at the Mary Rose museum located on the Royal Naval base in Portsmouth, England . A £20 million appeal for funds for The Final Voyage - the co-location of the hull of the Mary Rose with her artifacts in a new museum - was launched locally in Portsmouth on the evening of 10th March 2006. Leading local businesses, members of Portsmouth City Council and the Lord Mayor attended presentations in the current museum. Intended to attract 500,000 visitors and opening by 2012 (with active conservation of the hull intended to be complete in 2009), this new co-located museum will create a world-leading museum in Portsmouth for the Mary Rose and the Tudor Navy, an international centre for maritime archaeology and provide better facilities for education and outreach. This was denied a Heritage Lottery Fund grant in 2006 [1] . Further excavationOn 11 October 2005 , the 23rd anniversary of the original wreck lift, the anchor and parts of her bow were raised from the sea-bed in a delicate operation sponsored by the Ministry of Defence . These parts will also eventually go on display. See alsoFor other ships of this name see:
For general Tudor naval history, see:
For more information on archaeology and shipwrecks see:
For other warship shipwrecks, see:
External links
Spanish ship Santísima Trinidad
The Spanish ship Santísima Trinidad (officially named Santisima Trinidad y Nuestra Señora del Buen Fin ) was a first-rate ship of the line of 120 guns (when first built). Her armament was later increased to as many as 140 guns on four decks. For many years she was the biggest warship in the world.ContentsDesign & constructionShe was built at Havana , Cuba, to a design by Irish naval architect Matthew Mullan and launched in 1769 as an 120-gun three-decker (some sources say 116 or 112 guns). For many years she was the biggest warship in the world, being considerably larger than her British contemporary Victory and somewhat bigger than the French Bretagne . There is no complete plan of the ship in existence, but there are of the 112-gun ship from 1765, which might be found the original dimensions of the ship : (the next dimension are in feet of the burgos (278,6 mm), and metres.) length = 213 2/3 (59,53), keel= 182 5/12 (50,82), beam= 57 3/4 (16,09), depth= 28 11/12 (8,06). For exact figures, and those in the General Characteristics frame, see: José Cayuela Fernandez - Trafalgar, hombres y naves entre dos épocas - Ariel 2004 . In 1795, her forecastle was joined to her quarterdeck to create a fourth deck containing a battery of eight pounder guns, giving her a total of 140 guns. Her armament seems to have been quickly reduced to 130 to 136 guns. Even so, she now carried the largest number of guns of any single ship of her time. As the only ship with four gun decks, she was reputed to be the largest warship in the world, until surpassed in sheer size by the new type French 120-gun ships such as the Océan (1790) and Orient (1791) . The additional weight of guns so high above her waterline made her sail poorly, leading to her nickname , El Ponderoso . It was even suggested that she would best serve the navy by having her duties restricted to the defense of the Bay of Cádiz . Santísima Trinidad remains famous as one of the few four-decker ship of the line ever built. The U.S. Navy constructed the four-deck, 136-gun Pennsylvania , and the Royal Navy planned but did not actually build the four-deck Duke of Kent .
In July 1779, Spain declared war on Great Britain, joining France in support of the American colonists in the American War of Independence . Santísima Trinidad became the flagship of the Spanish fleet, taking part in the Franco-Spanish operations in the English Channel in the late summer of that year. In 1780 she took part in the capture of an English convoy of 51 ships. In 1782 she was incorporated into the Mediterranean Squadron, participating in the second siege of Gibraltar and she fought in the brief and indecisive Battle of Cape Spartel . In 1795, she was modified by the addition of extra 8-pounder guns on a new deck between her forecastle and quarterdeck . In 1797, she was the flagship of Teniente General José de Córdoba , the Spanish commander, at Battle of Cape St Vincent on 14 February 1797 , where she was badly damaged and nearly captured by the British fleet. She was first in action with the British ship Captain 74, commanded by Commodore Nelson , and Culloden 74. She was then attacked by the Blenheim 90, Orion 74, Irresistible 74 and Excellent 74. By now she was severely damaged, having lost all her masts and with half of her crew killed or wounded. She struck her colours , but the British failed to take possession and she was saved by the Pelayo 74 and Principe de Asturias 112. Several days later, Santísima Trinidad was spotted, still damaged, making her way back to Spain, and engaged by the frigate Terpsichore 32, but she escaped. She eventually returned to Cadiz for repairs. Eight years later, commanded by Francisco Javier Uriarte and Rear Admiral Baltasar Hidalgo de Cisneros , she took part in the Battle of Trafalgar on October 21 , 1805 , as part of the combined Franco-Spanish fleet. Her great size and position immediately ahead of the fleet flagship Bucentaure made her a target for the British fleet, and she came under concentrated attack by several ships. She lost her mast and eventually surrendered to the Neptune , commanded by Captain Thomas Fremantle . She was taken in tow by the Prince , but sank in a storm the day after the battle. TriviaA real-size model of the Santísima Trinidad can be seen and visited in the harbour of Málaga , in Spain. Sources & references
External links
The Venus has been a familiar sight around Pensacola for many years. Her graceful lines and white hull made her one of the prettiest "belles" in the bay. This photo was taken about 1930. Bill Broughton, the owner & skipper is active with the Pensacola Yacht club.
PROJECTS FOR THE BISHRAMGANJ–INDIA AwF PROJECT
Integration of aquaculture in watershed management programmes to benefit the poor tribal people of Tripura, India Background This project on Integration of aquaculture in watershed management programmes has been planned to help the very poor to marginal farmers. It is necessary to educate the people about the new opportunities available for the effective utility of the available resources and create responsibility for the protection, preservation and responsible management of all the available resources. The quality of the eco-system and the people are planned to be improved through the intervention of the proposed project. The occupation of the people in this project is largely agriculture and labour work. They are cultivating rice, vegetables, Potato and Pineapple. 100% of the people are scheduled tribes. They are the major tribal group like Debbarma, Riangs, Jamatia, Tripuri, Notia and Garos along with many other sub tribes. The other sources of livelihood for the tribal are Fishery, Piggery, Goatary and Poultry. The people are largely dependent on forest products. Through this project, we would like to create awareness on integration of aquaculture in watershed management to improve their income, family nutrition and create employment opportunities. Situation in Tripura: Specific problems and needs The state of Tripura is divided into four civil districts namely Dhalai, North, South and West Tripura. It spreads over an area of 10,846 Sq K.M. And the population is around 30 Lakhs. Though the government and its Tribal Welfare Department were doing different projects for the welfare of the tribals for a long time, it had not made any impact in the life of the real poor tribal people in the state. The socio-economic life of the poor tribals remains unchanged because of the insurgency and corruption among politicians and bureaucrats. The tribal economy is based on the principle of self-sufficiency mainly centred around the hills and forests. There are 19 major tribes who form 30% of the total population of the State. The remaining 70% are Bengalis and Manipuris. The history of the tribal and the non-tribal living together in the State of Tripura has been a story of repeated outbursts of intolerance and distrust. Of late, such violent incidents have been on the increase and fear looms in the minds of people that the entire State is on the brink of a widespread communal riot. These and other factors, historical and geographical, have combined to make Northeastern region of India one of the poorest in the Country. Besides poor communication facilities, large-scale presence of armed militancy is another factor that drives away potential investors from this region. Violence has already brought to a grinding halt the system of education and healthcare especially in the tribal dominated rural areas. While most systems of development have ceased to function effectively, ethnic strife continues unabated claiming more and more innocent lives. The root cause of violence is poverty of the people especially the tribals. They are turned to violence and terrorism. The only way to bring back these people is wholesome employment. As employment in government sector is very limited and the only way is self-employment through vocational training either in mechanical or agricultural sectors. Origin of the project After much deliberation and thought, we the members of the St. Xavier's Bishramganj (Social Welfare Organization) thought it proper to intervene at this critical stage in the life of the people especially the poor people of Tripura. The only way to bring peace is economic development of the people, especially the tribals. The tribals have good amount of land. They have their personal land and the common land belonging to the tribe where they are able to cultivate. What the people at present require is training in scientific way of cultivation and some support to initiate the activity. They can be trained in different agriculture practices including aquaculture. They can set up their own aquaculture activity to improve their living.
Hence, St. Xavier's Bishramganj (NGO) and Fishery College, Lembucherra have identified the need for developing training modules for poor tribals engaged in their livelihood on natural resources and enable them to improve their livelihood through aquaculture. This project does not envisage training as an end itself, but aims to strengthen watershed management programmes through aquaculture. This project envisages imparting of comprehensive training in watershed management and upgrading the technical skills of people on aquaculture and providing them with equipments and financial support to set their own fishery for family consumption, self-employment and income generation. As a first step, this project is directed to the 30 poor families who are ready to learn and enable a living through self-employment by getting training in aquaculture. The proposal is the result of our interaction with the people of the area, who have repeatedly expressed to us the great benefits that would be derived if such a help is provided. Since the poor people living with poverty and unemployment, they find this project easy and assuring. It is also our hope that the beneficiaries of our project will successfully go through their course of training and later become successful fish cultivators, with the technical help forthcoming from the specialists. They will become agents of peace and communal harmony in a place that is in constant disturbance. We feel that the long-term objective of this venture is peace and human dignity through self-sufficiency.
Location of the Project: The Bishramganj-India AwF Project is located in Bishalgargh Block of West Tripura district. The project area is located around 25 km from the district head quarter and around 35 km from the state capital Agartala. The project area consists of ten villages namely Laltilla, Masterpara, Chikancherra, Bastoli, Bangshibari, Gulirai, Amtali, Sutarmura, Luntangcherra and Padmanagar. Aim of the project: To improve the quality of the eco-system and meet the livelihood needs of people, which will contribute to improve the socio-economic- nutrition- health status of people and ecological condition of the environment. Objectives of the Project:
Methodology:
hirty farmers chosen to work on this project will be trained by using the family approach wherein both husband and wife will be trained on fish culture over a period of two days by bringing them to the training centre. These trained farmers will utilize their knowledge to renovate their own ponds, which are currently used for water storage, wild fish capture and in some cases stocking of cultivated variety of fish, but without resorting to proper aquaculture practices. Popular carp species along with few of the self recruiting species will be introduced to ensure sustainability to the activity. Farmers will be encouraged to use the resources available for use as pond input. Integration of fish ponds with other agricultural activities will be encouraged. A project monitoring committee will be formed consisting of elected 4 -5 members from the community including the technical advisors from Central Agriculture University (Fishery College, Lembucherra) and Indian Council for Agriculture Research (ICAR). On site training necessary for the farmers will be provided based on the monitoring results. Base line bench mark information will be recorded to track the changes through the project. Participatory approaches coupled with the traditional scientific methods as appropriate will be used to capture the impact of the intervention. In order to create confidence among people and gain trust, the society will conduct initial training programmes and village level meetings with the technical support of experts. The follow up support and monitoring will be done by representatives of the society and technical help will be given by technical advisors. As we are closely associated with the developmental work carried out by Prof. Nandeesha (Fishery College, Lembucherra) and Dr. Santosh, Scientist of ICAR, Regional Office, Tripura, we are confident of implementing this project successfully. Additionally, the technical input for the project will be assisted, supervised, and monitored by Prof. Nandeesha in his capacity as an AwF volunteer. In recognition of the financial and technical input from AwF, the project will be named and referred to as the 'Bishramganj-India AwF project' in all documents. Expected benefits of the project: The implementation of the project will benefit the poor tribal people by enabling them to better utilize the resources available within their reach through aquaculture. This project will help to increase fish consumption through the introduction of this new activity scientifically. It will also create employment opportunity. Improved watershed management will help in recharging the groundwater resources, reduce soil erosion, decrease run off speed and increase agricultural productivity. In this first phase, we expect thirty families to derive benefits from this activity. Project duration: One year, commencing August 2005. Reporting: We will submit half yearly and final reports about the progress of the project to AwF. Also, on a regular basis, we will bring to your notice any interesting developments and problems encountered. Estimated project cost: The project aims at providing technical support and minimal support essential for the people to initiate the activity and experience the benefit of the programme. While part of the project activity will be covered through local contribution, an amount of Rs. 155,000 /- is requested from AwF. The local contribution will be in the form of labour and other farm inputs by farmers and the support by the Training Centre to cover part of the expenses involved in monitoring, organizing regular trainings, etc. Note: I million = 10 lakhs: One USD: @ Rs. 44/- Names of potential beneficiaries requesting help for the implementation of the Bishramganj-India AwF Project :
1. Gopal Debbarma 2. Lolang Debbarma 3. Harichand Debbarma 4. Khundi Debbarma 5. Haphius Mia 6. Humayun Mia 7. Nurul Hag 8. Apon Mia 9. Mujibur Rehman 10. Salima Mia 11. Wakhi Rai Debbarma 12. Borjola Debbarma 13. Kishore Debbarma 14. Rotiranjan Rai 15. Vijayakumar Taran 16. Kamaini Debbarma 17. Uttam Debbarma 18. Balaram Debbarma 19. Krishna Debbarma 20. Premmohan Debbarma 21. Shanti Debbarma 22. Nabin Debbarma 23. Nanigopal Debbarma 24. Shambu Debbarma 25. Mangal Debbarma 26. Kiran Mia 27. Sachindra Debbarma 28. Kamal Debbarma 29. Jadu Mia 30. Sadhu Molsom Note: Debbarma is a particular tribe. The list contains only male heads of family. The list has tribal families and Bengali hindu and muslim families as well.
BUDGET OF THE BISHRAMGANJ–India AwF PROJECT
Explanation to the budget requested: (1) Depending on the poverty level of the family, payment for the work carried by the family members for renovating their pond including hired labour will be compensated by paying the wages at the Government rate. (2) Part of the training and follow up support expenses will be covered with the budget indicated. (3) It is planned to restrict support to each family to a maximum of Rs. 5000/- . Families will be encouraged to make best possible decision on the utility of this support to increase aquaculture productivity. Yours Sincerely, Fr. K. J Joseph Sdb If the project is acceptable, please send your help in the name of the St. Xavier's Bishramganj A/C No: 6963 Central Bank of India Agartala Branch Agartala, West Tripura India Swift code: CBINIBICAL It is important to state that the money should go to Central Bank of India, Agartala Branch.
About the organisation: St. Xavier's Bishramganj (SXB)
St. Xavier's Bishramganj (SXB) is a social work organization and development wing of the Salesians of Don Bosco (Salesian Fathers) working in Tripura towards integrated development for all irrespective of cast, ethnic groups, and religion, with special focus on poor and marginalized, in the spirit of love and service. It is a non-profitable, non-political, voluntary organization registered under the Societies Registration Act 1860, and is committed to the uplift of the marginalized. Our vision is a self-sustaining, just and peaceful society based on the gospel values of empowerment, love and justice. We commit ourselves to the empowerment of the poor and the marginalized through development strategies that release the powers of the rural poor to transform their lives. The institute works with the people, rather than for them. SXB's strategy recognizes that the poor face multiple problems: lack of education, inadequate income opportunities, lack of scientific yet affordable know-how, ill health, a degraded environment, political oppression. SXB uses bottom-up, participatory, integrated strategies to address this interlocking nature of rural poverty. It is carrying out various Training programmes on different vocational trades, health, hygiene and environment. Objectives of St. Xavier's Bishramganj : The dream is to usher in through Economic Self-reliance, a suitable ambiance for dignified human living for all people especially the rural and economically weak agrarian community of Tripura. Ø Bring about self-reliance in economy by creating possibilities for people to engage in alternative forms of development that are viable, proven and self-sustaining. Ø Promotes development of the economically weak and predominantly agrarian sections of people in the remote areas. Ø Focuses on development strategies that release the powers of the rural poor to transform their lives. Ø Strengthen the self-determining capacity of the rural poor on the economic front. Programme areas and Goals:
Mushroom Reef Marine Sanctuary
Located on the open coast at Flinders on the Mornington Peninsula and covering 80 hectares in area, Mushroom Reef Marine Sanctuary supports the most diverse intertidal rocky reef communities in Victoria. The Marine Sanctuary comprises an extensive rock platform, with sheltered rock pools and coves protected by a shallow reef on the ocean side.
Things to Do The rocky shores and surrounding reefs at Flinders, at the south-west corner of Western Port, are famous for the diversity of their marine life. For over one hundred years, scientists and naturalists have frequented the reefs, and the area has revealed numerous animal species not previously known to science. Recent discoveries include sea stars that brood their young in their stomach and other tiny seastar species that were once thought to be juveniles. Easily visible are numerous rectangular crabs, multicoloured cushion sea-stars, small spiralled shells of all shapes and sizes and rows of daisy-like anemones. The seafloor within the coves (2 - 3 m depth) is carpeted in algae and seagrass, with the larger rocks of the reef covered in kelps, and smaller brown and red algae. The sandy bottom supports large beds of Amphibolis seagrass inhabited by a variety of fish including Saddled Wrasse and Magpie Morwong. Strange box-like Cowfish and Weedy Sea-dragons hover furtively over the seagrass beds. Black and White Sea Star
Geological, Hydrological and Landform Features Looking After the Park For the protection of the marine environment, a number of activities are prohibited within the boundaries of Victoria's marine national parks and marine sanctuaries. No fishing, netting, spearing, taking or killing of marine life. All methods of fishing, from the shore or the sea, are prohibited. As users of the marine environment, you can help minimise your impact on these areas by being mindful of the following points:
Remember, Marine National Parks and Marine Sanctuaries are NO TAKE ENVIRONMENTS. All objects (artefacts), animals eg. fish and crustaceans, plants, and the seabed are totally protected.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||